SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Citizens Manifesto -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amy J who wrote (98)6/15/2005 2:05:40 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 492
 
This implies Communism is more efficient (China's brand of it), than slow-growing Democracy.

Your conclusion implies that the main determinant of economic growth for China and India was their political systems. Other things (wars, ethnic turmoil, equality of sexes, etc.) also play a large part in helping/hurting a country's economic growth.

I would say a better comparison would be China versus Taiwan. In that case you've got the same people in two different political systems, and clearly capitalist Taiwan has outgrown Communist China.



To: Amy J who wrote (98)6/16/2005 5:04:17 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 492
 
China isn't very communist anymore. It still has elements of communism left but also has more and more capitalism. When it was solidly communist it didn't have a lot of wealth to spread around. Not it has a lot more wealth than it used to have but it is also much less evenly spread.

Tim