SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (237249)6/15/2005 7:52:58 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577928
 
"You should take time to learn the law ted...."

It depends on the area. In Texas, it is perfectly legal to tape phone conversations as long as one of the parties is aware of it. So her taping would have been legal at home. But in others, both parties have to give consent. In that case it would have been illegal. IIRC, the case was in Virginia, so it would depend on Virginia's law.



To: steve harris who wrote (237249)6/15/2005 1:50:15 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577928
 
It wasn't legal. She didn't have the consent of Monica.

Wrong.

You should take time to learn the law ted....

Which law is that? If you are going to make a counterclaim, at least back it up with a legitimate link. My understanding is that the law prohibits taping someone's phone conversation without their knowledge........that cases have been thrown out of court over this issue.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News