Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (237478)	6/15/2005 9:20:15 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573718

Ted, you're right, I don't know the whole story. All I can say is that no one, not even the most ardent defenders of Michael Schiavo, have convinced me that his adultery is excusable, even if his wife is terminally ill. How can a person commit adultery when their spouse is dead? The autopsy has shown that Schiavo was dead for over ten years. Only the unwillingness of her parents to accept her death kept her on a feeding tube. Her poor husband was put through so much abuse and had to erect a ten foot fence around his house because of people like her parents who were steeped in mysticism and unwilling to face reality......Terry Schiavo died when her brain stopped functioning. <end of story> At the very least, he could have just divorced her. Why he stayed married to her while shacking up with another woman and having kids is beyond me. There can be a ton of reasons why he didn't....until you talk to him and hear what he has to say why pass judgement? Maybe I'm just too hung up on the sanctity of life and marriage. But I'd rather err on that side than the side of "death for convenience." Damn! That was no death of convenience but you don't what to hear otherwise. I can't imagine a mind so closed to the truth. ted