SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (121050)6/20/2005 3:57:45 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793727
 
It's true that the Muslim world is watching us very closely through the lens of Al Jazeera.

But it's also true that what they're seeing in Durbin is a US politician who is able to say terrible things about the US government and suffer no retaliation, which is something they never see in their own countries.

A sizeable percentage of Americans think that the prisoners in Guantanamo are being mistreated. They have a right to that opinion.

If Americans were being treated like that, I hope you'd be outraged. I know I would be.

But I also recognize that the guards at Guantanamo are trying not to actually cause permanent injury, just humiliation and pain. So Durbin's comments are intemperate and unnecessarily inflammatory. But so are the calls to try him for treason and so forth.



To: DMaA who wrote (121050)6/20/2005 4:07:40 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793727
 
The accusation that US troops are as bad as Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot.

OK, thanks. I thought you must have been talking about the FBI accusations.

I just posted to CB. I cannot find al Jazeera's reporting on that "accusation." I can only find them reporting on the kerfuffle over it. Which is not to say that they didn't, only that I haven't yet found evidence of it. Do you know a source?

I won't argue with you, just as I wouldn't argue with LB, that Durbin didn't say that US troops are as bad as Hitler, etc. That would not be productive.



To: DMaA who wrote (121050)6/20/2005 6:38:08 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793727
 
re: Durbin: Powerline has posted the Aljazeera link on their view of Durbin's thoughts (see below), the ENTIRE statement Durbin read on the Senate floor, comments from Durbin on his website, Hugh Hewitt's continuing comments and thoughts from the Weekly standard....It's very much looking at the links from Powerline....

The Left that supports Durbin on this should be more than ashamed of themselves.

US senator stands by Nazi remark

english.aljazeera.net

Thursday 16 June 2005, 21:38 Makka Time, 18:38 GMT

A US senator has refused to apologise for comparing the actions of US soldiers at Guantanamo Bay to those of Nazis, while others have decried or defended the mandate and method used to hold prisoners there.

US Senator Dick Durbin on Wednesday refused to apologise for comments he made on the Senate floor referring to Nazis, Soviet gulags and a "mad regime" like Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.

Illinois Republican party chairman Andy McKenna had demanded he apologise.

"Senator Durbin's comments come as a great disservice to our military personnel in Guantanamo," he said.

"They are also a great disservice to all US soldiers and veterans who have fought, and continue to fight, to overcome evil regimes and spread democracy around the world."

Durbin did not plan to apologise for the comments, spokesman Joe Shoemaker said.

"This administration should apologise to the American people for abandoning the Geneva Conventions and authorising torture techniques that put our troops at risk and make Americans less secure," Durbin had said in a statement on Wednesday evening.

Attack

During a speech on Tuesday, Durbin, the Senate's number two Democrat, quoted from an FBI agent's report describing detainees at the naval base in Cuba as being chained to the floor without food or water in extreme temperatures.

"You would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime - Pol Pot or others - that had no concern for human beings"

US Senator Dick Durbin

"If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime - Pol Pot or others - that had no concern for human beings."

Durbin is not alone in his criticism.

Human-rights groups have long accused the administration of unjustly detaining suspects at the prison camp. Amnesty International last month called the detention centre the "gulag of our times".

Rebuttal

President George Bush and other administration officials, however, have strongly resisted such comparisons and questioned Amnesty's objectivity.

"It's difficult to explain to a mom and dad who's lost their son or daughter how you can have someone in Guantanamo Bay, release them and then they kill your son and daughter"

Alberto Gonzales,
US attorney-general


"I take strong exception to any characterisations that try to
diminish what our military is doing and the standards and values that they adhere to," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.

The Bush administration calls the Guantanamo prisoners enemy combatants who are entitled to fewer legal protections than those afforded to prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions.

Defence

According to US Attorney-General Alberto Gonzales on Wednesday, the US government often considers whether it would be better to stop detaining prisoners at Guantanamo.


Gonzales (L) has defended the
right to hold enemy combatants


"That's a question that is evaluated, I would say, quite often," he said in Sheffield, England, where he will attend a meeting of G8 interior ministers on Thursday and Friday.

On Wednesday, he had said "there will of course be an end", but did not specify when.

He also pointed out that about a dozen of those who had been released had returned to fight against the US.

"It's difficult to explain to a mom and dad who's lost their son or daughter how you can have someone in Guantanamo Bay, release them and then they kill your son and daughter," he said.

Since the camp was set up after the 11 September 2001 attacks on the US, 167 detainees have been freed and 67 others released to the custody of their home governments.

About 520 detainees from about 40 countries remain at Guantanamo. Only 12 have been handed over to military commissions for investigation of possible war crimes and four have been charged.

Debate

In a three-hour hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, legal experts from the US military and the Justice Department said the US had a right under the Geneva Conventions to hold enemy combatants.

But committee chairman Senator Arlen Specter suggested lawmakers would have to clarify what he called a "crazy quilt" of laws and regulations governing the detentions.

Some lawmakers want the facility closed, saying it has become a liability that inflames Muslims against the United States.

"Guantanamo is an international embarrassment to our nation, to our ideals and it remains a festering threat to our security," Senator Patrick Leahy, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said.

Survey

A Pew Research Centre poll, taken over the weekend, indicated most Americans agree that reports of abuse at Guantanamo are isolated incidents, and 39% think the news media is paying too much attention to the issue.

The poll found a sharp partisan divide on the issue - Democrats believing the abuses to be systemic and Republicans saying they were isolated incidents.