Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (121505)	6/22/2005 3:39:54 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793718

"We" are not going to have much say in the matter. Maybe this calls for a constitutional amendment. <g> Seriously, I think that part of the reason the judicial system is going in another direction is because the rational for differentiating these guys from civil offenders has not been laid out. They're hiding behind that ambivalence and hoping for the best or that judicial actions will be overtaken by events or some such. I still say that if they have a case they should make it firmly. If they don't, then they should use accepted paradigms no matter the weaknesses. This ambivalent mish-mash will end badly.