SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg or e who wrote (20635)6/23/2005 2:40:47 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Of course, it's chances of survival at that point are nil unless it attaches to the uterin wall, so it is far from clear that society could, practically speaking, do anything for it at that point even if it wanted to. This, IMO, makes this particular question moot at best - a red herring at worst.



To: Greg or e who wrote (20635)6/23/2005 2:44:46 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
It is a potential new human being, but is it actually a human being at that point? If it matured, and survived being born, it would be a distinct genetically different human being- but are you saying it is a human being at the moment of conception? I'm not interested in arguing about it; I'm merely trying to ascertain what it is, exactly, that you believe.



To: Greg or e who wrote (20635)6/24/2005 10:12:16 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
biologically and genetically distinct from the mother.
Does that mean that a fetus that is not genetically and biologiclly distinct from the mother not human?

It seems to me that is an irrelevant tidbit thrown into confuse the issue.
TP