Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (1925)	6/23/2005 9:19:58 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

Yes, SiouxPal, it does. It does that, and more. - Holly <edit - read the Rico statute and weep.> - Holly

To: SiouxPal who wrote (1925)	6/23/2005 9:59:26 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

Here's some help. www4.law.cornell.edu I'll try to get some of our lawsters in here. You'll be stunned at the way things work. In theory, you CAN get your property back. BUT you have to sue the federal gov't to do it. And win. And prove the gov't had no cause to take it in the first place. It seems that mostly people, even when found not guilty at trial, don't bother. The best advice is don't get caught by RICO. You may think you live in a democracy of laws with some reasonable expectation of justice. This will teach you otherwise. Raybo ought to focus his efforts on this.