SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (121955)6/24/2005 12:43:08 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793903
 
Rasul already gave them access to US courts. Reason being that they're in US custody in a place under US jurisdiction, Guantanamo, which is ours indefinitely. Rasul is 6-3, it's not going to be revised any time soon.

If you have a citation to a case that says once these guys are in the court system they get no due process, please link it. DC District Court cases, and there are a lot of them, give them due process.



To: D. Long who wrote (121955)6/24/2005 12:55:16 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793903
 
we're not alleging they did anything wrong

One of the things we analysts do is categorize things and put them into the appropriate boxes. It seems to me that, for the criminal justice system to be applicable, the action in question must first be a crime. If it's not a crime, you go to alternate box B, whatever that may be. If it fails the crime test, further barking is inherently up the wrong tree.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News