Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Digrdug who wrote (8550)	6/27/2005 8:42:07 PM
From: kknightmcc	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 12465

The shoe does not fit, which is why I am suing Mary in the first place. In the second place, the only thing the judge found was a lack of personal jurisdiction. She did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit, nor did she dismiss it with prejudice. I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration. It is not over and nothing you say will make the facts any different then what they really are. You haven't got a clue as to the real facts here. Following posts by Mary does not make you knowledgable about this litigation. It is unfounded statements about me that got Mary sued and nothing else.

To: Digrdug who wrote (8550)	6/28/2005 11:42:58 AM
From: RavenTree	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Amen to that. I've been sued in three states by ADOT because they didn't like me posting on RB that they had affiliations with a stellar list of stock touts including Allen Wolfson. The Nevada suit against me was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds but the suits in New Mexico (my home state) and Florida are still on-going. See my blog for the whole story. The supreme court ruling yesterday that journalists must name their sources or go to jail is yet another assualt on the First Amendment. Censorship by litigation insures that only those with money will have any kind of a voice. athena-sword.org