Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8551)	6/27/2005 10:07:11 PM
From: Digrdug	Respond to of 12465

So where are these "unfounded statements"? And why do you care what she thinks?? Too weird! Just my opinions

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8551)	6/27/2005 10:57:56 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Maybe if you strenuously object, that'll change the judge's opinion. Sometimes a mere objection alone just isn't enough, but if you strenuously object, there may be some prevailing hope. "I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration." Got any stock tips these days?

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8551)	6/27/2005 11:17:24 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

She did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit Kathy, is it true one reason your lawsuit was dismissed was for failure to state a claim? The general rule in appraising the sufficiency of a complaint for failure to state a claim is that a complaint should not be dismissed '***unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.' CONLEY VS. GIBSON (1957), 355 U.S. 41, 45, 46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2LEd 2d 80; SEYMOUR VS. UNION NEWS COMPANY, 7 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 168;... chrononhotonthologos.com - Jeff

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8551)	6/28/2005 3:27:19 AM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 12465

In my experience, that's a mistake - and I hope you raised new law in that motion because FRCP is strict on this: a motion for reconsideration is not a second bite at the apple, like my friend Rea just tried by ignoring the rules and filing a second motion to dismiss, which, by the way, was drafted by an attorney and filed as if he drafted it himself. Maybe you should file where jd is unquestionable - if your claims have merit. If they don't, then obviously filing them would be unwise. I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration.

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8551)	6/29/2005 11:29:55 AM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

kathy, I posted the legal docs here they have seen what has transpired. Why in the world would I want to argue the merits of this case iwth you, someone with no money who lives in a public housing project for poor people? Search the address she posts everywhere as her "stock promoter central" office. It's a housing proj ect. Who would take stock advice from someone who lives in a housing project? Obviously you don't know how to pick stocks or make mo ney.