SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (71389)7/4/2005 12:32:17 PM
From: Gersh Avery  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
"They" wouldn't let him fire it up ..



To: Gersh Avery who wrote (71389)7/4/2005 6:49:45 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Nope. Sounds fun and believable. That's not cold fusion -g-.
I wonder why this thing was never put together. Or if it was,
maybe, it never worked?



To: Gersh Avery who wrote (71389)7/4/2005 9:02:24 PM
From: Casaubon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
fusion reactors are obviously theoretically possible. The problem has always been limitations in material science. In other words, confining and capturing the energy of the fusion process, without blowing your machine apart.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News