Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (163721)	7/4/2005 4:44:49 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

HP has published a summary of 2P servers running SAP. Like the previous 4P summary, it inflicts a lot of pain on the competitors stuck with Xeon: ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/servers/benchmarks/ ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/servers/benchmarks/2p-sap.pdf Joe

To: hmaly who wrote (163721)	7/4/2005 5:28:23 PM
From: rzborusa	Respond to of 275872

Hmaly, why do you care. I have learned, a long time ago, to just take care of my business, and not worry about what everybody else is doing. If they want to claim Intel didn't break the law, then so be it. It isn't like you can do anything about it. Have patience, and take comfort in the fact that, as much as Intel has the chip system rigged; the bar ass. has the legal system just as rigged, and therefore you should get satisfaction in the end. Simply because the bar ass. has the system rigged to take money from the rich, and give it to themselves. And Intel has a lot more money than AMD, so for them to get rich, Intel will be found guilty, and AMD will have to be given their fair share, just so they can get theirs. Well said.

To: hmaly who wrote (163721)	7/4/2005 6:38:13 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"Elmer will accept anything which isn't favorable to Intel." Phuddy is absurd. His line of argument is characterized succinctly here: 4. Fallacy of argument from ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam) The Latin means "argument to ignorance." (a) Arguing something is true because no one has proved it false Example: "Aliens exist since no one has proven they don't." (b) Arguing that something is false because no one has proved it true. Example: "Aliens don't exist since no one has proven they do." ref:Thirty Six Common Fallacies Explained L. Van Warren Warren Design Vision from here: wdv.com