SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (26678)7/6/2005 10:44:03 PM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 360936
 
If there was a shield law, Judith Miller would still have to reveal her source or go to jail.

One of the standards Miller would have to meet, to protect her source, is to show that the leak was in "the public interest". How can leaking Plame's name be in the public interest?

Of course I don't think Miller meets the requirements of "reporter" either.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News