Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe_P who wrote (164360)	7/9/2005 1:51:41 PM
From: rzborusa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe P., Seems reasonable to me. I'd have to agree. If Intel were innocent, wouldn't they fight the charges? Maybe not, consider the possibility that Intel Lawyers are Amdroids. Not so far fetched considering JFTC are obviously amdroids. </efud>

To: Joe_P who wrote (164360)	7/10/2005 1:38:01 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe Seems reasonable to me. I'd have to agree. If Intel were innocent, wouldn't they fight the charges? Consider this analogy. You got a parking ticket, even though there was no "no parking" sign. Some of your best customers were in the car with you. It's a $2 ticket. You're certain you acted correctly but to fight the ticket you'd have to go to court and take your passengers(your customers) with you. Even though you're certain you've done no wrong, would you pay the $2 or drag your customers into court just to prove you were right?