Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (125204)	7/14/2005 10:52:07 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793838

I believe she stopped her covert work when she became a mommy 5 years ago. which was why she was no longer a covert agent in the field

To: mph who wrote (125204)	7/14/2005 11:11:33 AM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Respond to of 793838

Well said because it is well thought and well based on facts, not some politician's fiction and false hopes to strike a damaging blow. Who gives a damn about the facts when a politically opportune moment arrives?

To: mph who wrote (125204)	7/14/2005 11:28:59 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793838

You are so correct, mph....The media holds the public in contempt....Read some of these links from 2003, and there are more here on SI....we knew when it happened that Wilson was out to get Bush....And we know he was/is a Kerry supporter.... I hope the NYT gets nailed.... Message 21504297

To: mph who wrote (125204)	7/14/2005 11:46:48 AM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793838

Bottom line: Plame was not "outed" and there was never any "danger" to her. My guess is that there will ultimately be a finding that no law was broken, regardless of whose lips carried the sacred "Plame" name. So, that brings us to the question, who is Judy Miller protecting by her silence and willingness to spend 4 months as a guest of the Alexandria FCC? Stated differently, would the NYT go to the mat on this, and allow its reporter to go to jail on a matter of principle if the "source" being protected was one of those conservatives in the White House?