Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (241627)	7/14/2005 2:15:46 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571808

"I think there must be something there, maybe much more than we know" Who knows? Unlike Starr, Fitzgerald isn't leaking. Given that he likely has known most of the information already for a while, Novak probably squealed a long time ago, it is noteworthy that confirmation about Rove has been quiet so long. The question on the table is, does it go higher than Rove? Did Cheney have his fingers in this? Now Karl is perfectly capable of doing this on his own without any input from higher up. But Novak did say there were two senior administration officials... Dick "Nolo Contendere" Cheney?

To: Road Walker who wrote (241627)	7/14/2005 4:32:02 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571808

Fitzgerald is the wild card. He is supposed to be one real competent straight shooter. I can't imagine this thing going on for 2 years without anything of criminal substance, reporters going to jail and all; this guy would have shit canned it. He's a pro. I think there must be something there, maybe much more than we know, and if Fitzgerald comes out shooting at THIS administration, I'm sure he knows that he has to have all his duck lined up absolutely perfectly. They are sure to attack him personally and professionally if they find ANY opening. I think your observation is correct. This guy is moving slowly with a gread deal of deliberation. In addition, I understand the law that covers CIA leaks is very demanding when it comes to the evidence. I suspect that might be another reason to move slowly. ted