SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (126113)7/19/2005 11:24:01 AM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 793919
 
That was a mistake, it is true.



To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (126113)7/19/2005 11:34:06 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793919
 
I wonder what the consequences would have been if bush 41 had gone to bagdad. It was pre-alquaeda to a great degree but the sunni-shiaa-kurd conundrum would have still existed. Of course we had a hell of a lot more troops at that point than we do now. How would have it played out is the $64 question.



To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (126113)7/19/2005 12:39:34 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793919
 
Andrew, Bush 41 felt that he had to bend from the pressure being put on him by the UN. That is the only reason he stopped Stormin Norman from burying Baghdad. He should have told the UN the get the hell out of America, and shut up.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News