Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (35717)	7/19/2005 4:09:49 PM
From: Don Green	Respond to of 306849

Good movie The Dam Busters

To: bentway who wrote (35717)	7/19/2005 4:24:14 PM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I seriously doubt you could hurt the Hoover dam at all by exploding even a large bomb on it. It would probably damage the road but the explosion would disperse into the air almost immediately.. You probably couldn't even damage it by flying a passenger plane into the front of it. as you said, it's MASSIVE and the concrete isn't the weak garbage you mix for post holes. Thye WTC didn't fall from the impact and it was hollow. It fell from the jet fuel burning for a long time in a fairly confined area. I worked at a nuclear reactor for a time. The operators told me that the reactor building was so sturdily built that a passenger plane could hit it at full speed and the folks inside wouldn't even know it.