Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (242763)	7/22/2005 3:02:01 PM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1586313

Why are you wasting your time debating with the funnyfarm?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (242763)	7/22/2005 3:43:15 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586313

I personally believe the court should be the best qualified - the job is to critical to the country to be based on some other agenda. Of course the president in power at the time has an agenda - so it's already flawed in the beginning. :-( Yes, I would agree that best qualified is the way to go but can you honestly tell me that Roberts was best qualified with only two years experience on a federal court? I don't think best qualified was the primary standard for Bush's selection.