SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (694485)7/29/2005 2:13:23 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Here's a piece on shrillary...

michaelhodges.com

GZ



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (694485)7/29/2005 3:59:23 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Frankly, I don't see what the big deal is....Roberts was acting as an advocate....those papers are unlikely to be definitive as to his own thinking....



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (694485)7/29/2005 4:02:14 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The ruling set off a furor in legal organizations, which had maintained that the attorneyclient privilege protected government lawyers as well.

Be interesting to see how lawyers act when the client isnt Clinton but possibly a Republican. jdn



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (694485)7/30/2005 11:51:07 AM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I think the Clinton Starr case is different. That was a criminal investigation, not an advice and consent by the Senate. The precedent for judges releasing their private papers as attorney's have always been off limits.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News