SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (128869)7/31/2005 7:07:18 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
It makes no sense to me that someone who so disapproves of federally funded stem-cell research that he would veto a bell promoting it would not also disapprove of the privately funded variety.

Their argument from the start is that taxpayers dollars shouldn't be used to fund an activity they think is murder. They can't use this against private funding.



To: Lane3 who wrote (128869)7/31/2005 7:24:28 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 
IF Bush were so "opposed" to embryonic stem-cell research, he would never have proposed ANY of that type of research and suggest that the Government pay for it.

That's not the case, now, is it?

Key word...embryonic....

There are many types of stem cell research that are under way, and seem to be more promising than embryonic.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News