Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (167935)	8/1/2005 7:01:23 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'd seen this before, either here or elsewhere. It does not change my opinion. Iraq does not need to "side" with Iran for America to have a (much more) miserable time in Iraq. It will be sufficient for Iran not to side with the present Iraqi government and perhaps aid the insurgents a little bit. You do know that whatever "success" US has had in Iraq has been due to Sistani, an Iranian, restraining the Shia...Bush's forgotten Eastern Front, a.k.a. Afghanistan would be a lot worse too if Iran was to withdraw its calming influence.