Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (244705)	8/3/2005 3:15:41 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572758

If you assign the cost to whom it belongs the numbers would be higher in support of your idea. The idea is worth discussing if you consider the cost factor as well as the ethics. Fair enough. I would say the operation cost lies with the woman. The remainder of the costs (bring the fetus to "birth", put the child in an orphanage) lies with the voters of the state because theydecided to ban abortion. If they state tax payers don't want to bear that cost, then they shouldn't be allowed to ban abortion. The R&D necessary to produce the Fetus Preservation Machine could be Federal Tax Dollars.