Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (107142)	8/4/2005 9:22:45 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Some might argue that ID is the ultimate science. A beginning so complex that science cannot yet explain it. Have you read anything that George Gilder has written about ID?

To: epicure who wrote (107142)	8/4/2005 6:11:33 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I'm curious as to how natural selection is testable? BTW I believe natural selection makes a lot of sense as far as explaining an awful lot about how life changes over time. Although it obviously doesn't explain everything. It doesn't explain anything about the origin of life (as Darwin acknowledged when he concluded the Origin of the Species by writing of God breathing life into lts various forms), nor does it explain how observable irreducibly complex structures and processes arose. I see ID and natural selection as being very similar - both are based on observation of the natural world and reasoning as to how things came to be. And that's it. Both differ from the teaching of any set of scriptures, including the book of Genesis btw.