Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : History's effect on Religion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (218)	8/4/2005 3:17:26 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 520

"My initial response to you was a reminder that claiming any religion to be the "True" or "False" religion, as you blatantly did, is a no-no as clearly stated in the header." Again I have to object that you are not being fair. I looked back and cannot find any such statement "blatant" or otherwise. In fact I openly acknowledged that the Christian doctrine of resurrection might not be true and the Pantheistic doctrine (Pantheism has doctrines too) might be correct or true. What I know for sure is that "both" doctrines (since they are diametrically opposed) cannot logically be true. If you think they can be, then I would like you to explain how. My initial post was in the form of a question that was designed to prompt examination as to whether there might be bias in your presuppositions that render your stated attempts at neutrality, void. I think you will find me a reasonable person.