Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (130595)	8/8/2005 11:24:27 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793772

"I'm sorry religious differences have come this far," Judge James H. Chamblin said before his ruling. "It's kind of a microcosm of what's going on in the world today . . . about how fanatical some people can be about religion." There must be more to the lawsuit than just "disparagement", which is in the eye of the beholder. Mike Farris is too good of a lawyer and Judge Chamblin too good of a judge, at least that's been my experience. Usually the legal system doesn't get involved in matters of religious doctrine. Too bad for Hunley, though. Throwing someone out because they believe that baptism is essential to salvation? I hate to admit it but I never even knew that there were Christians who did not believe that. I can't keep track of all the ins and outs of the various Protestant schisms. (No offense intended to any Protestant.)