Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : History's effect on Religion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (309)	8/17/2005 4:30:20 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 520

Very well. There has already been some posts on this topic and there are evidence, as stated in the wikipedia article, that show the Gospel of Thomas must have existed in some form during the 1st century. Still, I will see what more I can find on this front as time allows me. It seems to me though, that you take the position that the present day Bible is not prone to misquotation and differences between various ancient texts of canonical gospels. If this is your position, then do you have any evidence for this? What are the oldest copies of Bible as you accept them and how do they differ from the say King James'?