SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Moominoid who wrote (67317)8/12/2005 9:32:17 AM
From: Slagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Moominoid Re; "supply shocks" Simmonds says demand was a big factor too and I think he was right. You had world oil demand rise from 45 mbd in 1969 to 65 mbd in 1978. And something Simmonds never mentions but I remember like it was yesterday is the big effect of the 1970 EPA regulations. All of a sudden industry (and utilities) switched from coal to oil and NG to keep from being fined and shut down by the EPA. This really ramped up demand and many similar efforts were going on overseas.

Also, the early 1970's was a strong economy with the newly finished interstates everywhere. The worst traffic jams I have ever seen in my life was on I-75 north of Atlanta at Christmas 1972 and 1973; Florida bound traffic literally backed up all the way to Chattanooga.
Slagle



To: Moominoid who wrote (67317)8/12/2005 10:24:14 AM
From: shades  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Krugmans oil supply demand curves are very different than what I saw in college econ classes. Multiple points of equilibria.

dickinson.edu

The Theory:

Modeled after the publications of Cremer and Salehi-Isfahani in 1989
Oil is different from most commodities for the following reasons:
It's an exhaustable resource
National governments control its production
For the biggest oil expoerters, it's a dominant source of national income
What these differences mean:
Because it's an exhaustabile resource not extracting it makes it a form of investment.
When oil prices are high it may look like a good investment for a national government.
If this government does not want to spend all the money it's receiving from these high oil prices it has one of three options:
engage in real investments at home = diminishing returns
invest abroad
cut oil extractions and reduce supply
There is good reason to believe that there are some high oil prices that lower output. This implies a backward bending supply curve.
Backward Bending Supply Curve
Caused by future price expectations
These expecations cause one to consider the opportunity costs of oil
If a price increase is expected to last for a while then the opportunity cost of selling a barrel today increases because the price of the oil is going to rise. This may cause the oil companies to save their oil and sell it later. This would create a negatively sloped supply curve.
If a price increase is expected to last for a short time then the opportunity cost of selling a barrel today is not going to increase. This would create a normal positively sloped supply curve.
Demand for oil is highly inelastic.
This is what the graph would look like:

As is evidenced by this graph there are multiple points of equilibria
High Price Equilibrium(PH)
This price is stable because it falls along the upward sloping portion of the demand curve.
This represents the price of oil in the beginning of 1973.
There is no excess supply at this high price so OPEC doesn't have a role in output control, but creates the expectations of future prices.
Middle Price Equilibrium(middle)
This price is unstable because it falls along the negatively sloped part of the demand curve.
Low Price Equilibrium(PL)
This price is stable because it falls along the upward sloping portion of the demand curve.
This represents the price that OPEC picked in December of 1973.


How This Explains Sudden Oil Prices Surges:

The changes in the price of oil come suddenly and unexpectedly
This would not happen with Cartel that is "gradually learning about its market power"
This would happen if unexpected events "tipped" the market from the high equilibrium to the low eqilibrium and vice-versa