SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (1725)8/12/2005 12:54:59 PM
From: A.J. Mullen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25575
 
I now see why Danbury might make a profit using CO2, while the UK government thinks that enhancing oil could only mitigate the cost of Co2 sequestration. Danbury isn't trapping and sequestering CO2. It's taking it out of the ground, then putting it back elsewhere.

Thus Danbury might be a good investment, but it doesn't provide a warm fuzzy bonus. It doesn't allow an investor to feel environmentally righteous.

Ashley


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News