SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (131975)8/12/2005 2:44:43 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793822
 
Do you at least acknowledge the conflict of interest Gorelick faced being on the commission and that this conflict casts a shadow on the credibility of their report?

No to both questions. All the present hoopla about the conflict of interest is the usual stuff from columnists like Deborah Oren, a long time right wing columnists. They are trying to use any means necessary to undermine the commission's report. So we'll hear a lot of that.

My own guess is that we sit back and wait to see how it develops. Zelikow managed the staff and my guess is that had he wished to have it brought forward it would have been done. Zelikow had as many, if not more, conflicts of interest than Gorelik and was clearly in a better position to do something about it.

But it's early.

On a different topic, looks as if it's late for DeLay's friend Abramahoff (sp.)



To: DMaA who wrote (131975)8/12/2005 4:06:36 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 793822
 
<<Do you at least acknowledge the conflict of interest Gorelick faced being on the commission and that this conflict casts a shadow on the credibility of their report?>>

No more than the defendant being the judge and DA at his own trial.