SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1671)8/13/2005 4:23:36 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24223
 
Open Letter to Senator Schumer

Ianqui from The Oil Drum asked me to post this letter that she is sending to US Senator Chuck Schumer. You will see lots of politicians pandering to their gas-guzzling constituency as oil prices climb. What we need to do is show them that these quick fixes are really just like giving an addict one last cheap hit before prices go sky-high.

-----

Dear Senator Schumer,
I am a Manhattan resident who proudly voted for you in the 2004 election. Overall, I have been pleased with your efforts in the Senate, and I commend you for your service. Today I am writing in regard to your amendment S.AMDT.805 to the recently passed energy bill H.R. 6. I realize that the amendment was ultimately tabled. However, I believe that your position is misguided, and I discourage you from pursuing such legislation in the future.

The amendment stated that opening the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) would allow the government to "circumvent the efforts of OPEC to reap windfall profits." However, available research suggests that current crude oil prices are not skyrocketing because OPEC is trying to make a profit, but rather because worldwide demand is increasing rapidly. As you know, the demand for oil in China grew by 15% in 2004 alone. The United States consumes approximately 26% of the world's energy resources, using over 20 million barrels a day, and our demand shows no sign of abating. In fact, prominent oil experts such as Matthew Simmons and T. Boone Pickens have argued that prices are not going to decrease any time soon. According to a recent CNN article (6/27/05): "Pickens said a shortage of oil is the main reason behind the price increase and didn't see how the world could produce more than the current 84 to 85 million barrels a day that currently comes out of the ground."

According to the Department of Energy, as of August 3, 2005, there were 283.3 million barrels of sweet crude and 414.9 million of sour crude in the SPR. Presumably, if the SPR were opened to decrease prices at the pumps, only the sweet crude would be tapped into for expediency. However, even if only 5 million barrels a day were released into the oil delivery system, the sweet crude reserve would last at most 10 weeks. This may lower gas prices for a brief period, but imagine how your constituents will feel when the relief is over and oil is back to $60+/barrel. Perhaps more importantly, if the SPR were depleted, it would have to be refilled. Certainly neither the government nor the taxpayers will be happy about refilling the reserves when oil is at $60, $70, even $80/barrel.

The SPR is an emergency reserve to be used only in times of extreme crisis, such as war or natural disaster. By depleting it simply to pander to your constituents, you would potentially leave the US vulnerable should we need petroleum in a time of emergency. In addition to the ever-present threat of a terrorist attack on oil pipelines in the US and Middle East, frequent hurricanes pose a serious danger to our oil infrastructure on the Gulf Coast. This kind of disruption of delivery would make prices much higher than the $2.45 that we're seeing at gas stations today, and the SPR should be left intact for such a situation.

If your goal is to lower energy costs for the American public, you would be better served by encouraging smart energy policy, such as improved CAFE standards and increased funding for alternative energy sources. I am pleased that you have introduced legislation on these issues in the past, and I hope that you will continue to be vocal about them in the future. Such measures would go a long way toward reducing overall US oil consumption. As your colleague Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) has demonstrated to the Congress, the rate of depletion of known oil fields is increasing faster than new sources of oil are being found. The United States would benefit from conservation measures that will help ease our dependence on oil. Surely we will thank you when oil prices reach $100/barrel, which many experts believe could happen even before your Senate term is up.

Sincerely,
Ianqui Doodle

peakoilnyc.blogspot.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1671)8/13/2005 4:30:58 AM
From: Bill on the Hill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24223
 
I have been waiting for you to show up....

I wanted to share my experience at the gas station today.
Went to town to work for awhile today. It was a short day. My good friend and spiritual mentor for years died this week.
His funeral today so I was in a real quiet mood. I got to the city line and saw that both gas stations had raised their prices by fifteen cents each.

My mood deepened.

I left my office about 11 to go home and change for the funeral. Stopped on the way at the station because it was packed in the morning. It was packed when I pulled in to fill up my pickup.

Lines. People waiting at the pumps. For fuel to show up. And not one person was happy. I mean scowls and angry looks on everyones face. And everyone milling around the station was laughing and complaining about the prices. Even heard a few "bullshits" in the conversations.

Fuel truck pulled in about five minutes after I got their. I left and went and paid a dime more down the street so I would not have to wait.

Reminded me of survival of the fittest. Darwin theory.

Went to the funeral. Mood lightened up there. It was a beautiful celebration of a troubled man that became an enlightened troubled man. Hugged his kids and kissed their cheeks.

We are at peak. If peak is real, we are there.
The people feel it.