SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : International Consortiums -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skywatcher who wrote (17)8/15/2005 6:49:06 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 49
 
Right. The hypocrisy is analogous to the alcoholic abusive father comparing pot to meth addiction, and telling his peace freak, pot smoking son that marijuana is dangerous.

The reasoned position takes into account 7 billion consumers of energy and asks how we can hope to reasonably afford a decent standard of living for all.



To: Skywatcher who wrote (17)8/15/2005 6:56:34 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 49
 
The primary question here is 'Why Not'?

The question is not 'Why Not Nuclear energy?' That question is already asked and answered pro and con in the usual debate of Green advocates vs development.

The question is 'Why some can have it and not others?' The primary consideration is with fear of nuclear weaponry, and hazard risk management. Those fears should be dismissed if we can truly create the international consortium as proposed in the header.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News