Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pictouislander who wrote (7711)	8/21/2005 12:59:48 PM
From: Jack Rayfield	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

pictouislander you and naturalperson just don't get it stating the facts is not bashing. The information that LOR presented is fact and just because it doesn't match up with you expectation and the tone of the PRs issued by Pyng lately is the whole point that has always been the case and the longtime posters just recognize it and are cynical of anything said by Mike. If you do not believe LOR figures represent all sales to the military why don't you call Mike and get clarification and find out what the actual breakdown of military sales to civilian sales are for this year and last year. If LOR's info is so bad it looks like Mike would be falling all over himself to point out LOR's false information. The fact that he has not gives further credibility to LOR numbers not to mention they come from a total unbiased source the US Government which provides the data for everyone as a freedom of information requirement. It looks like the old timers are doing all the work and reporting to the forum and the newbies just can not believe the facts but don't have the commitment to follow up on what they question. I guess the negative oldtimers will have to continue to carry the load. I don't need to call Mike because I have seen the actual report and know that LOR numbers are taken from the most credible source. LOR and Ed have made immeasurable contributions to this forum by hardnosed research and reported it with candor not the "smoke" of a promoter the oldtimers feel an obligation to share the facts and unvarnished truth not hype. We expect management to keep us informed at all times and we do not excuse disingenuious and misleading statements by management as typical of Venture exchange companies and better than most as naturalperson "super gambler/investor" suggests we should. We hold Jacobs to the same standard that should be required from any publicly held company. We all believe that Pyng the product will succeed and reward us that is why we stay invested but we are not going to blow smoke up new/ prospective investors butt to try and help that along. Regards Jack

To: pictouislander who wrote (7711)	8/21/2005 3:07:30 PM
From: LOR	Respond to of 8117

Pictouislander...Time for you to GROW UP and learn to take the bad with the good. I was as surprised as anybody else to see the apparently slumping PYNG FAST-1 military sales figures (available to everybody at www.usainfo.com for a mere $5). Frankly I hope that the report is dead wrong....but I haven't seen or heard any evidence to the contrary. I have always believed that the FAST-1 is a great product but have been dismayed on a number of occassions by PYNG senior-most management..................... Would you have preferred that I NOT share this info with the forum????............. Do you think that you would have perhaps been able to sell your shares at a higher price if only sugar sweet B.S. was floating around this forum? In that case by all means why don't you go set up a "good news only" forum elsewhere? LOR