Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (169677)	8/23/2005 2:37:20 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer, I am not sure how your reply relates to my post and where the disagreement is. Joe

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (169677)	8/23/2005 6:42:13 PM
From: gzubeck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer, If you are so confident in Intel's 65nm...please provide (1) Yield/Speed per batch at 65nm for the new processors What if AMD's 90nm process is as good as Intel's 65nm process yield-wise for speed grades... Are you still claiming AMD will not have 65nm by mid 06'? I think that claim is crazy? Maybe AMD doesn't want Intel to know what they have!...;>)

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (169677)	8/23/2005 7:48:00 PM
From: inex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

What is true is that Intel has real working silicon on a real working 65nm process running in real systems while AMD has nothing to show except a photo of a test chip of unknown origin. The situation demands an answer as real as the real systems Intel is running at IDF. This post surprises me... you seem like a completely different person when referring to an Intel PR announcement than you do when referring to an AMD PR announcement. The tone of this is much the same as the tone of the "droids" when referring to the lawsuit... You know as well as most that a "no answer" from AMD doesn't signify anything... It would appear that you are using double standards for AMD and Intel... No answer from AMD will be a loud answer indeed. So, since Intel refused to "answer" AMD's challenge today for a dual core performance showdown, we should interpret this the same way???