Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (2012)	8/24/2005 11:24:32 AM
From: wherry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

That sounds OK, until you realise that the US has just effectively abrogated the NAFTA treaty, by choosing to ignore a recent determination of the final stage of the (US demanded and designed) Dispute Resolution process. If push comes to shove, why do you think that Canada would now continue to follow NAFTA rules if they appear to be seriously against its essential interests in a specific case (an oil supply crisis, perhaps?), when the US has already shown that it holds such rules in contempt in much less serious circumstances? I suspect that Canada will try to continue to behave "legally" in the current softwood dispute, but eventually (if the US continues or repeats its behaviour), public pressure will make our rather weak government take retaliatory action, if that is the only language that is understood by the other party. It would be nice if I did not have to write such sharp messages, but that's the way things look from this side of the border. Tony