Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (65976)	8/28/2005 5:39:05 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Iraq never attacked us. And had nothing to do with Al Qaida or 9-11. The only terrorists they supported were Palestinians attacking Israel, and Saddam just did that to win friends in the Arab world because we were trying to isolate him. The much bigger source of terrorist funding is Saudi Arabia, and the biggest current hide-out for Al Qaida is Pakistan. Both key Bush allies whom he apparently will never criticize.

To: Dan B. who wrote (65976)	8/28/2005 6:14:15 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

YOu just have to ask yourself this question: Did terrorist attacks decrease after Saddam was removed from power? If the answer is yes, then Bush's policy of ordering troops into Iraq succeeded. If the answer si that it has increased, then we have a problem here, is it not? MIssiles being fired at US naval ships from the shores of a country which is US' top notch ally should say something here. And they have not arrested the perpetrators yet!!! What is the mission. What is its goal. How does Bush measure its success. What are the plans to go there from here.