SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (248500)9/1/2005 2:04:37 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573841
 
CJ, It looks like New Orleans is the direct result of criminal negligence and much of it could have been prevented.

Kind of hasty to jump to that conclusion, don't you think?


No. The storm spared NO the worst. Had the levees held, things would be bad but not desperate like they are now. It had been known for some time the levees were not in good shape. Federal assistance was requested and was denied repeatedly. The money was diverted to the war in Iraq and tax cuts. Sure looks like criminal negligence to me.

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (248500)9/1/2005 5:11:16 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573841
 
"Kind of hasty to jump to that conclusion, don't you think?"

Well, let's see. There was a plan in place to deal with a hurricane hitting New Orleans that involved getting stuff ready to move in the immediate aftermath of the storm. That plan was ditched along with IMPACT. Nothing was put into motion on the national level until Wednesday. In addition, maintenance work on the levels was halted last year for the first time in 37 years. Lastly, FEMA was ordered to stop planning for dealing with disasters and no other body was charged with that duty.

Sorry, they can't even argue stupidity. This transcends a persistent vegetative state.

Jumping to conclusions would be to claim that they did this because New Orleans tends to vote democratic.