Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (66227)	9/2/2005 10:33:27 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Who said "Then why is Bush not in Indonesia, Phillipines and most of all in Pakistan and Afghanistan..." You said that. LOL....do you even know what you say when you write it? We ARE in Afgthanistan...we ARE no doubt in Pakistan. And what makes you think we aren't working with-in Indonesia and the Phillipines to stop terrorism? I'd say it's highly likely that we are. There may be evidence that Clinton let Osama go, and it may be an unfair charge against Clinton for all I know, but by god I surely don't see a fair charge in saying Bush let Osama go. You interpret my post as indicating that it is impossible to win the terror war, but that is not the meaning of my words, not my intent, and not my belief. You are mistaken. We definitely need to fight major battles where terrorism breeds, and Iraq was such a place. Iran is another such place without a doubt. Afghanistan was too, of course. Your notion that we can't win the war on terror with Bush in power is true only because he can't legally remain in power for the time required. If Bush doesn't start (as he seems to be), or his replacement doesn't start and finish, action against Iran for starters, the war may indeed never be won. Dan B.