SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/2/2005 1:47:05 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Fri Sep 02 2005 12:49
trotsky (@what has changed) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
we don't know yet whether the Fed will REALLY stop raising rates, but what has changed is the market's perception about rate policy in the wake of Katrina.
FF futures have priced out two rate hikes that were previously thought to be a done deal, while lowering the odds on the one hike ( September meeting ) remaining. consequently, the yield curve is - for now at least - back in steepening mode.
this is the most important fundamental driver of gold and gold stock prices, and it has now turned from unfavorable to favorable, thus the recent rally.
nevertheless, the fact remains that the participants in the gold sector are very unanimous in their bullish positioning. e.g. the XAU index option p/c OI ratio has now fallen back to the 14% percentile - i.e., it is lower than 86% of all readings over the past year. similarly, it is reasonable to assume that speculators, after briefly taking flight from gold futures on Tuesday, are back in force on the long side. sector wide put/call OI ( on individual stocks ) remains at an annual low.
otoh, money flows into the sector remain largely positive ( it's been a bit of a mixed picture very recently, but not a negative one ) , both in terms of traditional methods of analysis as well as my specialized tape-reading method. the best explanation for this is that NEW money ( i.e. from investors not previously engaged in the sector ) has found its way into it, on account of the above mentioned change in the interest rate outlook ( by the way, this is something that should be considered by those that regard gold's recent gains as 'blood & misery money'. it is NOT the disaster itself that has reinvigorated gold, it is the market's expectation of the authorities likely interventionist reaction to it ) .
all in all, it now looks like the sector is going to follow by and large the seasonal chart , with the positive factors ( a big factor is also the fact that Indian physical demand is strong, and that the WAG signatories can't sell anything for another 35 days or so ) outweighing the negatives for the duration of the seasonal strength period, probably followed by a big correction ( on account of the large spec net long position ) when it ends.
this would actuall be the optimal outcome from the long term bullish PoV, as we'd likely get a higher low by the time the cyclical turning point in November comes around.
this scenario ( up into late September, then down with a general stock market sell-off into a November/December, or alternatively late October low ) would be the ideal set-up for resumption of the secular bull market.
delving a bit into detail, the near term strongest resistance is provided by the fact that in the September series, the September 100 XAU call sports the greatest concentration of call open interest, but it seems that's not impossible to overcome, since it's only about 4,400 contracts ( conversely, the biggest September put OI concentration is at the 92.50 strike, which has just recently provided support ) . the biggest concentration of call OI by far is the December 115 strike with over 11,000 contracts open.
such a big strike usually serves as an attractor for prices ( no guarantee of course, but recall e.g. how the large call OI in the Aug. 445 call strike in the gold contract 'pulled' prices to just underneath the strike before a sell-off began ) .



To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/6/2005 10:58:23 AM
From: ild  Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 10:32
trotsky (Katrina and the broken window fallacy) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
the latest prominent proponent of the broken window fallacy proudly flaunting her complete ignorance is the labor secretary Elaine Chao...gushing over all those jobs that 'will be created to rebuild' on TV.
i imagine she'd eagerly anticipate an asteroid coming our way. failing that, maybe she'll get her jollies from a creatively destructive, labor-intensive earthquake. the bigger the better, presumably.
would the thought of the Yellowstone caldera erupting and burying the whole country in two meters of volcanic ash fire up her imagination and give those help-wanted ads a badly needed lift? or how about Cumbre Viejo plunging into the sea and sending a 50 meter high tsunami wave at 700 mph across the Atlantic? you better have call options if that happens...surely the stock market won't ignore the merits of such growth-boosting devastation, with the labor secretary's insights fresh in mind.



To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/6/2005 1:58:20 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 13:43
trotsky (Egoli@Bushonian Potemkin villages tour) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
first of all, this is normal and to be expected. to have the emperor seemingly have help magically appear in his wake for the benefit of the TV cameras is 100% compatible with the m.o. of modern day politicians. one shouldn't necessarily single out Shrubbery for that, because the handlers of a different president would have organized a similar circus.
i can confirm that European coverage of the disaster was extremely critical of the official response...a tone of stunned disbelief permeated it, and apparently for good reason.

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 13:22
trotsky (Yorkie, Mooney, etc...) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
first of all, determining whether gold's purchasing power in general has held up well by picking out a few specific items ( without even documenting how those items have changed in fiat money price over the time frame observed to boot ) isn't a good way of proving the case that's been made. admittedly it's not easy, and i don't know what methodology was used in the purchasing power chart that was posted at resourceinvestor some time ago ( the one that shows gold's purchasing power has actually increased by about 80% since 1780 ) . instead of wasting time arguing, i'm going to find out and report back on the topic.

however, this here:

"In the 1880's gold was widely used as a store of value. Indeed it was used in coinage. Now-a-days bank accounts are more generally used ( except for a rather strange minority group of people .. grin ) . In other words, it is used relatively less and it's value may reflect that."

is simply wrong. just because bad money has driven out good money in daily use, doesn't mean that the good money has lost its moneyness. it has merely been withdrawn from circulation - if the state forces a fiat currency on everyone, you'd be a fool to pay for anything in gold. the proof is in the pudding - if the market didn't think gold was more than just an industrial material used in the creation of ornaments, it wouldn't trade where it trades. as everybody knows, the indestructible stock of gold already in existence dwarfs the annual industrial use of gold by a factor of almost 50. no pure industrial commodity has a comparable inventories-to-flows ratio. that doesn't leave too many options when one tries to explain how it comes that it trades at $440 for a measly ounce. seems simple enough to me.

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 12:42
trotsky (doran) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
"The drivers are asking others to sign a petition calling for government intervention in the rising cost of fuel."

this neatly encapsulates what's wrong with the world...everybody's crying for government intervention. of course the government just loves to hear it - justification for its existence reaffirmed. hand us the barf bag.

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 12:35
trotsky (James@broken windows) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
in fact, it is to be expected that the gubmint's economic statistics will record an increase in economic activity on account of reconstruction. but that only proves beyong a shadow of doubt that those statistcs aren't worth sh*t, to put it bluntly.
it is a case of the seen versus the unseen - the resources that have to be diverted into rebuilding can now not be used anymore for other things. if the government concludes that this is a net gain somehow, then all we learn is that its statistics tell us nothing whatsoever about wealth gained or lost. they're worse than useless, they're misleading. real resources remain scarce, no matter how much funny 'money' the Fed futilely prints when disaster strikes, or how diligently the state's statistics minions mangle the resulting activity.



To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/6/2005 2:21:36 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
From Heinz on BGO and MRB:

i don't see what's not to like...BGO has wrapped up the financing and has posted fresh drill results that suggest an even bigger discovery than previously thought, and MRB's news seem to confirm that the El Morro deposit is taken seriously by Noranda/Falconbridge.
of course the lackluster market reaction to these news shows that the sector as a whole remains largely unnoticed and out of favor for now. with BGO one could at least put it down to various concerns about the debt and the political risk, but MRB should have taken off already, on the Cerro news alone, not to mention this fresh information on El Morro and its recent exploration updates. MRB is clearly objectively undervalued here imo. BGO is more difficult to judge, since its price harbors far more optionality which depends on sentiment.




To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/6/2005 3:48:30 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 15:09
trotsky (Hambone - silver bear trap) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
definitely possible...my point is only that the bear trap isn't confirmed just yet. it has become more likely with this quick turnabout though...plus, as we know, the silver CoT report doesn't look bad ( per se not a reason to expect a specific outcome either, but its supportive of the idea ) .

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 14:30
trotsky (Hambone@silver triangle) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
looking at the weekly chart, the broken trendline hasn't been regained yet:

tfc-charts.w2d.com

if it IS regained, it would be a powerful bullish signal ( a negative technical development negated is usually extra-bullish ) . hasn't happened yet though.

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 13:47
trotsky (Bizarro@Hillary) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
she would of course rather have price controls and the shortages those would bring, in the reasonable expectation that everybody would beg for more state intervention to fix what previous intervention has wrought. it's an old socialist tactic, deployed to great effect countless times.



To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/6/2005 7:35:38 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 16:47
trotsky (picked up on TV) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
i quote: 'investigating Katrina and the response to it is likely to occupy lawmakers over the coming months...'

don't you feel better already?

Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 16:14
trotsky (@stock market) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
every time the market twitches back up a little there's breathless gushing over the twitch in the media, but the fact remains that its still where it already was 6 years ago, and all 'long term investors' who entered the market at the time ( which presumably includes a large contingent of retail investors who hopped aboard the bull market in its latter stages, plus a number of institutions as well, that followed the herd into upping their equity allocations ibid. ) are now sitting on a fairly large, and growing, loss in real terms. i guess one could call it a stealth bear market.



To: orkrious who wrote (40727)9/7/2005 1:27:30 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 12:47
trotsky (Hambone) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
true, their balance sheet is nothing to write home about, but who remembers that it actually looked a whole lot WORSE when the stock traded at 75 cents in late 2001, shortly before running to almost $6 over the following 12 months? at the time they were also saddled with a hedge book ( imposed by the inimitable Brett 'let's hedge our arses off at the worst possible moment' Kebble ) that is most charitably described as an unmitigated disaster, plus an electricity hedge with Eskom that provided an additional drag. all those impediments are now gone. in 2001-2002 DROOY was obviously bailed out by a collapsing Rand coinciding with a rising gold price, but i distinctly remember how the rickety balance sheet improved at the time in the blink of an eye to a very solid position.
anyway , the fundamentals aside, the chart now looks really good....definitely one of the better ones out there, long sideways consolidation that indicates there could be quite a run if it breaks out for good.

Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 12:32
trotsky (Egoli) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
here's the Zen answer: what is, is.
the options markets exist, and since the data are published regularly, they convey what is imo valuable information on trader sentiment. as an investor or trader one is almost duty bound to review them from time to time.

Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 11:52
trotsky (Hambone) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
"DROOY is such a basket case" - correction, WAS a basket case.
it has discarded the loss making North West mines some time ago. its main asset is now its stake in Porgera, which is among the best gold assets in the world, in terms of size as well as production cost. DROOY's remaining major SA operation Blyvoor is treading water at the current Rand gold price, but has huge reserves potential should the Rand gold price increase. the surface treatment operations in SA have always been, and continue to be profitable ( they're however no big deal ) .


Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 11:33
trotsky (silverfox, 8:59) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
you are forgetting that oil is a fungible commodity. when oil production is taken out in one place, the effect of that ( rising oil prices ) is felt everywhere. if the price were 'controlled by regulations' as you seem to wish for, the result would simply be shortages, as the available oil would be shipped to those places where normal market prices continue to reign ( a lesson the Chinese are just re-learning, and they're also re-learning it in Baghdad, where the government was just forced to impose selective driving bans to conserve fuel - a direct result of state-controlled, subsidized gas prices ) .
the only sensible thing the government could indeed do in order to soften the blow would be to at least temporarily lower the outrageous taxes it levies on petroleum products. that way one would both relieve the financial pressure on motorists as well as ensuring that no shortages would develop. your cry for more regimentation is quite wrong-headed imo.

Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 10:41
trotsky (@pm stocks - sentiment data) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
so what's holding them back? the answer imo is to be found in the large number of open calls in many of the major optionable pm stocks. large open interest at key strikes creates 'options-related resistance' that acts as a powerful drag on price performance. however, this options resistance can also turn into an afterburner powering an advance IF prices manage to get past the strike prices concerned, as all the uncovered calls that have been sold provoke delta-hedging.
THE stock to watch in this context is NEM, the put/call open interest ratio of which has just fallen to its lowest point in a year ( a negative contrarian signal, as it indicates that option traders are now more bullish on NEM than at any time during the past year ) . it has large call OI at the 40, 42.5 and 45 strikes. the biggest support in the form of open put options otoh is provided by the 37.5 strike.
imo NEM must overcome these call strikes decisively, especially the 40 strike, in order to open the way for a bigger advance in the XAU; alternatively we want to see these open calls taken off.
the next problem are the XAU index options. shortly before and after the August expiration, put OI consistently hovered just below call OI , producing a halfway decent , if not overwhelmingly convincing ratio. this has since changed, as in the weeks since the August expiration, call OI has steadily increased from 15,370 contracts to now 23,190 contracts, while put OI has remained almost flat, increasing from 14,720 to only 15,890 contracts. the resulting ratio is now lower than 96% of all readings over the past year. the biggest concentration of open calls is in the September and October 100 strikes, as well as the December 115 strike. after September expiration, the Dec. 115 strike may act as an attractor for prices, but imo we'd need to see a shift after Sept. expiration in the form of more puts being added at higher strikes ( currently, put OI is concentrated in strikes ranging from 85 to 92.5, an upward shift would be desirable ) .
all in all , the current situation is not what bulls would like to see. by way of comparison, during the big advances in the XAU in the first half of 2002 and from late March to December 2003, put OI on average exceeded call OI by a a large amount - 145 puts open for every 100 calls, while right now we have only about 70 puts open for every 100 calls.
a recent positive development from a sentiment PoV is the fact that Rydex fund traders have become a bit less enthusiastic about the sector and have withdrawn about $35 m. from the Rydex pm fund ( which opens the way for money to flow back in ) .

Date: Wed Sep 07 2005 09:56
trotsky (@DROOY) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
the 'impossible' seems to be happening - imminent break-out:

stockcharts.com