Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (22861)	9/4/2005 11:46:21 AM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32873

Too late to help for this disaster, but it will be available at the flip of a switch for the next one.

To: SI Bob who wrote (22861)	9/8/2005 9:53:59 PM
From: manny_velasco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32873

Hello Big boss I am writing you reggarding your post on A@P's thread. I was wanting to know has somebody double check the facts in the following The portion of Mr. Elgindy’s trading profits subject to forfeiture should be limited to his profits from the alleged insider trading in only the four stocks as to which the jury found Mr. Elgindy had engaged in securities fraud: OSIN, PLMD, JUNM and SEVU (the “conviction stocks”). Using a method of calculating proceeds from insider trading that actually takes into account when alleged inside information regarding the four conviction stocks was disseminated to Mr. Elgindy and when the information would no longer be material (as discussed in detail below), Mr. Elgindy’s illegal profits on these stocks would be $41,897.89. I am having a very hard time believing the figures on this and half way thinking something might have gotten change during the past down of information. If I am wrong, please for give me.