SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (497)9/16/2005 2:33:11 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217645
 
How the internet killed the phone business. Almost-free internet phone calls herald the slow death of traditional telephony

Sep 15th 2005
From The Economist print edition

economist.com

THE term “disruptive technology” is popular, but is widely misused. It refers not simply to a clever new technology, but to one that undermines an existing technology—and which therefore makes life very difficult for the many businesses which depend on the existing way of doing things. Twenty years ago, the personal computer was a classic example. It swept aside an older mainframe-based style of computing, and eventually brought IBM, one of the world's mightiest firms at the time, to its knees. This week has been a coming-out party of sorts for another disruptive technology, “voice over internet protocol” (VOIP), which promises to be even more disruptive, and of even greater benefit to consumers, than personal computers (see article).

VOIP's leading proponent is Skype, a small firm whose software allows people to make free calls to other Skype users over the internet, and very cheap calls to traditional telephones—all of which spells trouble for incumbent telecoms operators. On September 12th, eBay, the leading online auction-house, announced that it was buying Skype for $2.6 billion, plus an additional $1.5 billion if Skype hits certain performance targets in coming years.

Telecoms and the internet
Sep 15th 2005

The internet

Mergers and acquisitions

Telecommunications






This seems a vast sum to pay for a company that has only $60m in revenues and has yet to turn a profit. Yet eBay was not the only company interested in buying Skype. Microsoft, Yahoo!, News Corporation and Google were all said to have also considered the idea. Perhaps eBay, rather like some over-excited bidder in one of its own auctions, has paid too much. The company says it plans to use Skype's technology to make it easier for buyers and sellers to communicate, and to offer new “click to call” advertisements, but many analysts are sceptical that eBay is the best owner of Skype. Whatever the merits of the deal, however, the fuss over Skype in recent weeks has highlighted the significance of VOIP, and the enormous threat it poses to incumbent telecoms operators.

For the rise of Skype and other VOIP services means nothing less than the death of the traditional telephone business, established over a century ago. Skype is merely the most visible manifestation of a dramatic shift in the telecoms industry, as voice calling becomes just another data service delivered via high-speed internet connections. Skype, which has over 54m users, has received the most attention, but other firms routing calls partially or entirely over the internet have also signed up millions of customers.

A price of zero
The ability to make free or almost-free calls over a fast internet connection fatally undermines the existing pricing model for telephony. “We believe that you should not have to pay for making phone calls in future, just as you don't pay to send e-mail,” says Skype's co-founder, Niklas Zennstrom. That means not just the end of distance and time-based pricing—it also means the slow death of the trillion-dollar voice telephony market, as the marginal price of making phone calls heads inexorably downwards.

VOIP makes possible more than just lower prices, however. It also means that, provided you have a broadband connection, you can choose from a number of providers of VOIP telephony and related add-on services, such as voicemail, conference calling or video. Many providers allow a VOIP account to be associated with a traditional telephone number—or with multiple numbers. So you can associate a San Francisco number, a New York number and a London number with your computer or VOIP phone—and then be reached via a local call by anyone in any of those cities.

Furthermore, your phone (or computer) will ring wherever you are in the world, as soon as it is plugged into the internet. So you can take your Madrid number with you to Mumbai, or your San Francisco number to Shanghai. Skype and other VOIP services, in other words, are leading to lower prices, more choice and greater flexibility. It is great news for consumers—but terrible for telecoms operators. What can they do?

Watching the elephants dance
As is always the case with a disruptive technology, the incumbents it threatens are dividing into those who are trying to block the new technology in the hope that it will simply go away, and those who are moving to embrace it even though it undermines their existing businesses. Since VOIP will cause revenue from voice calls to wither away, the most vulnerable operators are those that are most dependent on such revenue.

In particular, that means mobile operators, which have been struggling for years to get their subscribers to spend more on data services, but are still hugely dependent on voice. Worse, the very “third generation” (3G) networks that are supposed to provide future growth for these firms could now undermine them, because such networks make mobile VOIP possible too. Least vulnerable, by contrast, are those fixed-line operators that are now building new networks based on internet technology, which will enable such firms to benefit from the greater efficiency and lower cost of VOIP compared with traditional telephony.

These operators are taking an “if you can't beat 'em, join 'em” approach and getting into the VOIP business. While their voice revenues will slowly evaporate, they will then be well placed to offer fee-based add-on services over their new networks. Again, this is a common pattern with disruptive technologies: forward-looking incumbents can end up giving upstart innovators a run for their money.

It is now no longer a question of whether VOIP will wipe out traditional telephony, but a question of how quickly it will do so. People in the industry are already talking about the day, perhaps only five years away, when telephony will be a free service offered as part of a bundle of services as an incentive to buy other things such as broadband access or pay-TV services. VOIP, in short, is completely reshaping the telecoms landscape. And that is why so many people have been making such a fuss over Skype—a small company, yes, but one that symbolises a massive shift for a trillion-dollar industry.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (497)9/16/2005 3:28:55 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217645
 
Am I prepared for TeoTwawki? Message 21454368

<Why TJ and the No-Brainer housing shorts might lose their money.

Offical rant on financial relativity theory applied to houses.

If a house measures $100 long x $100 wide and $10 high, it is a good-sized house of 100,000 cubic dollars.

When the $ pixelation processes, combined with China manufacturing maths and India productivity boom, shrink the size of the $ but without apparently changing the financial size of "Made in China" and "Developed in India", the weird outcome is that prices of goods and services decline, incomes stay about the same but some things, such as houses, get relatively "bigger".

So a bar of gold 5 years ago might have weighed $280, but without changing size, it now weighs $430.

The $100 x $100 x $10 house now measures $130 x $130 x $13 = 219,700 cubic dollars for an apparent doubling in size from the original 100,000 cubic dollars. Yet the house is in fact still suitable for the same number of human habitants, has the same views, access to city and facilities etc.

The size of the house can't suddenly shrink back to 100,000 cubic dollars because the measurement system under financial relativity theory has changed. And will keep changing as we continue to accelerate towards the financial speed limit which is equivalent to the speed of light in normal relativity theory.

The financial relativity speed limit is an asymptotic limit which we can never reach because the faster we go, the more financial energy is required to gain a bit more speed. Same as in normal relativity for moving stuff really fast.

Of course, this process can be interrupted by people like Pol Pot, Mao and ilk who decide they don't like the way things are going. Americans can vote for an Albanian type protectionist closed border. They can wage Armageddon style war to bring on The Rapture and "paradise" [which will of course look absolutely nothing like paradise when the smoke clears].

So, I'm not offering my usual double your money back guarantee. But, if electorates and rioters don't go nuts and destroy everything, financial relativity theory will continue to operate.

QCOM to $1 trillion by 2010! Maybe Google will beat them.
>

$458 for Aztec baubles now. $43 for QCOM. Still the 10:1 ratio [even ignoring the QCOM split a couple of years ago].

QUALCOMM is doing very well and cyberspace is burgeoning faster than the US$ is fizzling. The Quid will segue out of cyberspace and into the minds of people around the world. This is the second coming, with Rome losing sway and individuals around the world forming a brotherhood of man [to use the old sexist language - women will have the sisterhood of women simultaneously though with less Quid to count].

Actually, Rome kept sway and Christianity took over Rome via the Vatican and Catholicism. The olde style barbarian emperors lost their power. Of course the inquisition, burnings at the stake, and other barbarisms of Catholicism inverted the situation back again, with power being vested just a bit up the road from the Colosseum where the Christians were fed to the lions and generally used as bloody entertainment.

I am not quite prepared, though personally I am reasonably secure. I still need to get the Quid up to speed, ready to step into the breach at the right time to save the world [if not those enjoying the full faith and credit of the USA and other fiat-mongers]. That process is well in hand. Don't panic. We have nothing to fear, but fear itself.

Mqurice

PS: The Quid here Message 21696792