Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (67357)	9/23/2005 3:17:33 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The Sierra Club cut the funding in 1979

To: American Spirit who wrote (67357)	9/24/2005 6:52:47 AM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

as. you said...."Bush-Delay cut the levee funding to send money to Iraq.".... Failed Levee Recently Upgraded September 02, 2005 One might ask about the effectiveness of the overall plan for upgrading the levees based on this performance, and whether that had anything to do with their failure to win as much federal money for the project. However, that question can wait until Lake Pontchartrain gets hemmed in behind its girdle once again and New Orleans gets back on its feet -- as could all the anklebiting about the budget process and responsibility for the levee system. However, since that anklebiting appears to have so much attraction, allow me to point out a couple of facts. The power of Category 5 hurricanes have been known since Galveston in 1900, and certainly snce Hurricane Camille in 1969. Given New Orleans' fairly unique situation, the result of a direct Cat-4 or -5 hit has always been presumed to carry the inevitable result of levee failure. If we want to play the blame-Bush game, we can also play the blame-Nixon, blame-Ford, blame-Carter, blame-Reagan, blame-Bush 41, and blame-Clinton game, especially after Hurricane Andrew in 1992. However, since Congress allocates the money and the President has no line-item veto or modification power, the responsibility for funding these programs falls to our representatives. But for what should they be blamed? After all, they have to weigh risks and benefits with each item in the budget, as well as whether a project has a responsible and practical value. We don't know what kind of project got proposed and whether the $71 million it lost funded any kind of practical effort. Given the new and improved levee that produced the failure, perhaps the decision made some sense at the time. And let's not forget that the levee system protecting New Orleans belongs to the people of Louisiana, not the feds. It protects one city; it isn't an interstate system such as the ones built along the Mississippi. Why didn't Louisiana fund its own improvements? What have they done about the situation except wait for the rest of the country to fund them? That's the problem with ankle-biting -- a plethora of ankles. Now isn't the time for standing around and pointing fingers. We have much more important work to do in getting people to safety, getting them food, water, and shelter, and recovering what we can for New Orleans. Let's try reaching out instead of making this yet another point of polarization for the uberpartisans to stall with their venomous rhetoric. See John Cole and Ezra Klein for more thoughts. Full article >>> captainsquartersblog.com