SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (171280)9/25/2005 9:07:00 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Bring Back Warren Harding By Frank Rich

villagenews.weblogger.com

September 25, 2005

THERE are no coincidences. On Monday, as L. Dennis Kozlowski was slapped with 8 to 25 years in jail for looting Tyco International of some $150 million, the feds were making their first arrest of a high-ranking member of the Bush administration.

The official was David Safavian, the chief of White House federal procurement policy who once worked for Jack Abramoff, the sleazy Republican lobbyist whose disreputable client list, in another noncoincidence, included Tyco.

While it's an accident of timing that Mr. Safavian was collared at his suburban Virginia home just as Mr. Kozlowski was sent to the slammer in New York, the two events could not better bracket a corrupt era worthy of the Gilded Age.

Ours will be remembered as the Enron era. Enron itself is a distant memory - much like all that circa 2000 talk of a smoothly efficient C.E.O. presidency led by a Harvard M.B.A. and a former chief executive of Halliburton. But even as American business has since been purged by prosecutions and reforms, the mutant Enron version of the C.E.O. culture still rules in Washington: uninhibited cronyism, cooked books, special-favors networks, the banishment of whistle-blowers and accountability. More than ideology, this ethos has sabotaged even the best of American intentions, whether in Iraq or New Orleans. Unchecked, it promises greater disasters to come.

As recently as 10 days ago, when he resigned before his arrest, Mr. Safavian was the man who set purchasing policy for the entire federal government, including that related to Hurricane Katrina relief. The White House might as well have appointed a contestant from "The Apprentice."

Before entering public service, Mr. Safavian's main claim to fame was as a lobbyist whose clients included Indian gaming interests and thuggish African regimes. Mr. Safavian now faces charges of lying and obstructing the investigation of Mr. Abramoff, the Tom DeLay-Ralph Reed-Grover Norquist pal who is being investigated by more agencies than looked into 9/11. Mr. Abramoff's greasy K Street influence-peddling network makes the Warren Harding gang, which operated out of its own infamous "little green house on K Street," look like selfless stewards of the public good.

You know that the arrest of Mr. Safavian, one of three known Abramoff alumni to migrate into the administration, is the start of something big. Alberto Gonzales's Justice Department announced it only after Mr. Safavian had appeared in court and had been released without bail. The gambit was clearly intended to keep the story off television, and it worked.

It won't for long. The Enron odor emanating from Mr. Safavian is of a piece with the rest of the cronyism in the Katrina preparedness package. The handing off of FEMA from President Bush's 2000 campaign manager, Joe Allbaugh, to Mr. Allbaugh's even less qualified buddy, Michael Brown, in 2003 is now notorious. (The two men have been friends for 25 years but were not college roommates, as I wrote here last week.)

But that's only the beginning: the placement of hacks like "Brownie" and Mr. Safavian in crucial jobs hasn't been slowed one whit by what went down on their watch in New Orleans.

Witness the nomination of Julie Myers as the new head of immigration and customs enforcement at the Homeland Security Department. Though the White House attacked the diplomat Joseph Wilson for nepotism because he undertook a single pro bono intelligence mission while his wife was at the C.I.A., it thought nothing of handing this huge job to a nepotistic twofer: Ms. Myers is the niece of Gen. Richard Myers and has just married the chief of staff for the homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff.

Her qualifications for running an agency with more than 20,000 employees and a $4 billion budget include serving as an associate counsel under Kenneth Starr; in that job, she helped mastermind the costly and doomed prosecution of Susan McDougal, and was outwitted at every turn by the defense lawyer Mark Geragos.

Ms. Myers is only the latest example of Mr. Chertoff's rolling the dice with Americans' safety during his brief tenure in Homeland Security. After the bombings in London in July, he vowed to maximize his department's "finite human and financial capital to attain the optimal state of preparedness."

Yet the very same day, the president nominated Tracy Henke as Homeland Security's new executive director of the Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness. Ms. Henke, a John Ashcroft political appointee at the Justice Department, has since been unmasked as an Enron-style spinner of numbers.

As Eric Lichtblau of The Times reported in August, it was she who ordered the highly regarded nonpartisan head of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Lawrence Greenfeld, to delete a reference to politically embarrassing data in a government press release for a report on racial profiling. When Mr. Greenfeld complained, he was demoted.

Imagine Ms. Henke, in her Homeland Security job, having sway over press releases about our disaster readiness. There is likely to be nothing but good news until it's too late. But if the hiring of the likes of Ms. Henke, Ms. Myers and Mr. Safavian is half of the equation in Enron governance, the other half is the punishing of veteran civil servants like Mr. Greenfeld for doing their jobs honestly.

Even as it fills its ranks with Abramoff golf-junket partners, political flunkies and underemployed relatives, the administration silences those who, like Sherron Watkins at Enron, might blow the whistle on any Kozlowski or Ebbers or Rigas fleecing or betraying the taxpayers.

Three weeks before Mr. Safavian's arrest, the Army Corps of Engineers demoted another procurement official, Bunnatine Greenhouse, who was a 20-year veteran in her field. Her crime was not obstructing justice but pursuing it by vehemently questioning irregularities in the awarding of some $7 billion worth of no-bid contracts in Iraq to the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root.

Ms. Greenhouse and Mr. Greenfeld are only two of the many whistle-blowers done in by this administration so far. (Congressman Rahm Emanuel, Democrat of Illinois, lists nine on his Web site.) Even top government officials who are not whistle-blowers, merely truth-tellers, are axed. Lawrence Lindsey, the president's chief economic adviser, was pushed out after he accurately projected the cost of the Iraq war at $100 billion to $200 billion.

Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, was shunted aside after he accurately estimated the number of required troops ("several hundred thousand") for securing Iraq. Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld, who presented rosy scenarios of getting the job done with Iraqi oil income and low troop deployments, stayed on to bungle the war.

Their errors were compounded when the administration staffed the post-Saddam American occupation with exactly the same kind of appointees it would later bring to homeland security: the two heads of "private sector development" in Iraq were a former Bush fund-raiser in Connecticut and a venture capitalist who just happened to be Ari Fleischer's brother. As The Washington Post reported last year, major roles in the L. Paul Bremer regime were given to 20-somethings with no foreign service experience or knowledge of Arabic simply because they had posted their résumés at the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank where Mr. Bremer had chaired a task force.

The damage done to the mission in Iraq and homeland security alike by Enron governance is immeasurable. Administration apologists who now claim that hurricane relief will bring still more examples of innovative, C.E.O.-style governmental enterprise (Mr. Bush's "Gulf Opportunity Zone," for instance) conveniently sidestep the harsh truth that such schemes are destined to be as empty and corrupt as Andrew Fastow's Raptor partnerships at Enron once they're staffed from the apparently infinite crony talent pool.

YET it's not only the administration that is to blame, any more than it is only the executives who are at fault when a corporation rots. Culpability also belongs to the board that rubber-stamps the shenanigans - to wit, Congress.

Republicans in the Senate are led by Bill Frist, who, in the grandest Enron manner, claimed last week that it was to avoid a conflict of interest that his supposed "blind trust" unloaded all of his holdings in a Frist family-founded company just before its stock tanked. (Federal prosecutors and the S.E.C. are investigating.)

As for the Democrats, they are nonpareil at posturing about the unstoppable nomination of John Roberts - a conservative, to be sure, but the rare Bush nominee who seems both qualified for his job and unsullied by ethical blemishes. Yet when David Safavian was up for a job involving hundreds of billions of dollars, and much of his dubious résumé was fully known, he was approved by the ranking Democrat, Joe Lieberman, and all his colleagues of both parties on the Governmental Affairs Committee.

Which is to say that the rest of us, the individual shareholders in government who have voted in our Enron-era politicians, are responsible, too.



To: geode00 who wrote (171280)9/26/2005 1:32:04 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Geode, when I was young, enthusiastic and ignorant, I was all for BIG government. It seemed efficient to me to have one airline, one bus at a time coming on time, with optimum loading, a government-owned road system accessible to all, one water supply and so on, with government looking after the hopeless to ensure nobody was overlooked and beggars didn't depend on their begging talents but got help because they were unable to do things to help themselves.

Unfortunately, my ideas were half-baked because human nature being as it is, such ideas don't work. Without competition and incentive too many people go to sleep at the wheel. With concentrated benefits and diffuse costs, everything costs "Just $1 per person and we can do this wonderful project", which usually benefits a few friends of the people doing the allocating of funds and capital works. With government power, friends of the bosses are protected by licensing, import permits and other trade restrictions to enable milking of the rest. On and on it goes, inefficiency piled on greed, underpinned by waste, fraught with ignorance and lost to kleptocrats.

Yes, it is actually a beast: <The word beast in the expression refers to the government and the programs it funds, and implies that these programs are destructive.> Literally a beast. A mindless beast. One of the more hideous programmes is welfare, which pays people to torture children to death. That's as beastial as life gets.

Of course that isn't the intention, but beastly minds don't achieve much more than bestiality. The intention is to help those who are in trouble. The outcome is that cash is delivered, no questions asked, to those who figure out how to rort the system. Unfortunately, in a LOT of cases, the deliveries are sufficient to give incentive to people to have children as a meal ticket. No children, no benefit. One child, some benefit. Two children - turbo-charged benefit. Hmmm... three even more. Can't have the guy around though or he can't also claim a benefit. Children get more sympathy and more benefits, after all, we can't leave children to suffer.

Unfortunately, the outcome is that child deaths from abuse were near-zero decades ago, or even at zero. Now, there is so much child abuse the government social services can't keep up, and the outcome is the children mostly make it to adulthood and go direct to government care in prison. Some are buried before adulthood. Some as infants. Some are maimed. Some, quite a lot, kill themselves deliberately. Some die in "accidents" resulting from lack of self-care. Some are murdered in angry conflict.

If no money went to them, they'd soon lose interest in having the children and they'd farm them out to somebody who did care, of which there are swarms.

With little or no work ethic, no savings concept, let alone investment ability, they are limited in income and are therefore unable to afford medical treatment, or education, so end up with a minimalist state effort to look after them.

I prefer the ultrawealthy to spend their own money, rather than have state kleptocrats take it by force to waste on wacky ideas. People who have earned heaps, generally don't like to see it poured down the drain.

$ill Gates is out to cure malaria and a lot more besides. I'd bet on him before a government agency, which is primarily interested in self-perpetuation. They last thing a government agency wants to do is actually cure malaria or they'd be out of business. Dr Jacobs has donated large amounts of money to engineering education and a San Diego orchestra, among other things. Ted Turner paid a big pile of money to the United Nations [I think he did that].

They like to achieve great things.

Small government doesn't lead to fraud, theft and autocracy. The small government would specifically gaol frauds, thieves and bullying thugs. It is government that is autocratic - private businesses all have to compete for sales with others. <A bunch of people running around doing what they like doesn't lead to an efficient market, it leads to fraud, theft and autocracy. >

People doing what they like is a good thing. That doesn't mean they can attack other people or their property or steal it, or defraud others, or harm them or put them at risk. The purpose of a Libertarian government is specifically to prevent that.

Private business requires care and attention to others for profit and survival. Government requires only care and attention to the acolytes, courtiers, supporting military, or supporting voters. The rest can go to hell; and often do, dragged kicking and screaming, against their will.

Mqurice