SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (253245)9/30/2005 3:32:20 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571929
 
Al, it's obvious you have no idea what Mr. Bennett's original point was, nor do you really care as long as there exists an opportunity to nail another outspoken conservative.

I don't need to do that at all...they seem to be doing that very well on their own. I wonder what mystical reasons you'll divine for mr delay's indictment, of frist's sec scrutiny, or hastert's remarks about new orleans, and now this gambling virtuoso wind bag.

So here's another challenge I know you won't accept: Try and figure out what Mr. Bennett was trying to say in the first place. Once you figure it out, then we can talk about why he felt the need to bring up race in making that point.

When you do the archive search to find conservative posts supportive of Clinton's action in Kosovo...deal?

Al



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (253245)10/2/2005 1:27:48 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571929
 
Try and figure out what Mr. Bennett was trying to say in the first place.

He was trying to say that one particular group of people is responsible for most of the crime in the USA and that theoretically genocide would eliminate them.

Is that what you want your leaders saying?