Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tmarsh who wrote (92633)	10/3/2005 9:28:41 PM
From: itilis2003	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

The victims of his crimes ? How about the honest market participants (long or short) who were trading without the benefit of material non-public information stolen from the FBI databases ? How about the folks who shorted the scams that Tony didnt expose because he accepted compensation instead ? (Clear Felony conspiracy regardless of how dirty the companies were) Tony has a long history of breaking NUMEROUS laws. Even PRISON time didnt stop his criminal behavior. Even his arrest didnt stop him from boarding a plane with false ID and large sums of cash. He deserves to lose every single asset he has as well as his freedom for at least 15 years in my opinion.

To: tmarsh who wrote (92633)	10/3/2005 9:35:37 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

jesus christ tony was/is a piece of shit that made money by charging 600 bucks a month to jerkoffs as soon as anyone pointed this out on this thread they were banned too funny

To: tmarsh who wrote (92633)	10/3/2005 10:55:47 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

He is was found guilty of trading on information not readily available in the market and gained that knowledge in an illegal way. IF true there are indeed victums. say I was buying the stock he sold short. If I had the same info he had then I may have not of went long. IE in that scenario the buyer is the victum. The market operates on the fundamental principle that we all have equal access to the info. IT deosnt matter how much he made on the information he gained illegally. He Broke the law - The court says so. as far as the penalty phase - well that is once again in the hands of the courts.