Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (706813)	10/11/2005 5:26:15 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Seems to me trying to apply a label to a Supreme court judge is foolish anyhow. I think what the PEOPLE want is a no nonsense judge who will follow the law as proscribed in the Constitution and the Countries laws since enacted by Congress. PERIOD. What the PEOPLE do NOT WANT is a judge that attempts to MAKE NEW LAW where non exists and which the people are opposed. Example, gay marraige. In the states where THEIR supreme courts allowed it, its been OBVIOUS it goes AGAINST THE GRAIN of the PEOPLE and the EXISTING LAW. Those are the type of judges WE DO NOT WANT. If following the law is called CONSERVATIVE so be it, but to me its just called HONESTY. jdn