Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (706848)	10/11/2005 1:20:58 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You define a crime and state Harriet Miers must prove her innocence. Americans do not think that way.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (706848)	10/11/2005 4:11:50 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

By your own admission, you have no more reason to call her like David Souter then you would to call her like Scalia. In fact that is the entire problem, she is unpublished and no one knows HER position. Dont be sullied by people with their own idealogies to press for. You do know Bush, and I bet you would accept that Bush would NEVER knowingly appoint anyone who would attempt to legislate from the bench. Now, Bush has known this woman for 25 years. There are other people who have known her for an equal amount of time such as that judge in Texas (forgot his name). These people say she is not going to legislate from the bench. Why would you not listen to those who know her well, over those who know nothing about her? jdn