SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92817)10/12/2005 8:54:20 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
How about Michael A. Sylver of AZNT notoriety, for instance?

"Do you also give CEO defendants a chance to tell their side of the story?"

That could be good for a laugh.

Of course. If you run across any, point them to SI.

- Jeff



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92817)10/12/2005 7:16:49 PM
From: just_a_question  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 122087
 
Mr. Mitchell,

Do you believe the jury should have returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all counts?

Here is rundown of answers for current posters based on their posts. They can correct me if I am wrong.

Question: Should the jury have returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all counts?

Answers:

DaleBaker - No

Matthew P Tyson - Absolutely Not. They should have returned a verdict of guilty on all counts. Mr. Breen should have added more counts.Be sure to take away the shoes of Amr if I decide to drop by and say Hello. I may want to check the change in his pockets. I am still trying to collect on my judgment. Where is that Ferrari?

Aristox - No

Maurice Winn - No

itilis2003 - Are you kidding. No question about it. The answer is NO.

Bear Down - No

Tool Dude - EMPHATIC YES. OJ Simpson was not guilty. The juries were correct in most of the John Gotti trials except, of course, for that last time.

Mystery Magician - Appears, Disappears, Reappears again and again but always with an EMPHATIC NO and a post about CAIR

Scionist - Doesn't care. Just here for entertainment and to spar with Mystery Magician

RealityBites - No

Nowandthen - Too lazy to find and read the website of the DOJ and believes all of this is a hoax

BillfromWisconsin - Did you say IGTN?

Boquacious - unclear

Peter Michaelson - Knows in his heart that the answer is No but is having a hard time admitting it to himself

Man On The Moon - Knows the answer is No but won't admit it in public

SI Dave - unclear

SI Bob - unclear

Bill Ulrich - unclear

Tommy Hicks - No

Tonto - No

Ravenseye - No

Rock_NJ - Too busy with his hobbies of Traveling, Partying, Computers, Skiing, Weather to care much

Jeffrey Mitchell - Doesn't want to answer the question because he knows the answer is NO.




To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92817)10/12/2005 9:43:32 PM
From: Tommy Hicks  Respond to of 122087
 
Hi Jeff, you may have not have been thanked for all the court documents lately, but you have now. Your contributions have enlightened us far more than than our efforts entitled us to. You are a treasure of information.

th