Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (255834)	10/17/2005 12:34:38 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572749

Why should a state legislature determine whether a woman has a baby or not? How can a few dudes in capital city have any idea what is best for her or her family? You could say the same thing about all health and/or right to life laws. If someone is going to make abortion policy, it seems more appropriate to have elected officials make it than appointed justices, that's my point. Unless you think the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion (seems a stretch, if the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion but not the right to smoke pot, or the right to drive without a seatbelt).

To: TigerPaw who wrote (255834)	10/17/2005 12:34:42 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572749

Why should a state legislature determine whether a woman has a baby or not? How can a few dudes in capital city have any idea what is best for her or her family? You could say the same thing about all health and/or right to life laws. If someone is going to make abortion policy, it seems more appropriate to have elected officials make it than appointed justices, that's my point. Unless you think the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion (seems a stretch, if the constitution guarantees the right to an abortion but not the right to smoke pot, or the right to drive without a seatbelt).