SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kech who wrote (255996)10/17/2005 10:19:44 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1572795
 
"So you think a drop in world production from 2.5 million to 2 million was the reason for the war as was suggested by AS?"

That was AS's thesis, not mine. I was just pointing out that production hasn't reached pre-invasion levels, far from it. And those forecasts assume a decline in the insurgency, something that isn't in evidence.



To: kech who wrote (255996)10/17/2005 10:20:12 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572795
 
"What about forecasts for next year, pretty close to 3 million. "

Wolfowitz predicted the invasion would pay for itself! How long are you going to drink the koolaide?



To: kech who wrote (255996)10/18/2005 12:09:39 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572795
 
What about forecasts for next year, pretty close to 3 million. Long term expectations are for 5 million. Hardly something you would do if you wanted to drop production and raise price.

Forecasts of 3 million barrels have been made for the past two years. Those forecasts have never been met. What's changing to allow for 3 million next year?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News